inulro: (Default)
[personal profile] inulro
54. The Hammer and the Cross: A New History of the Vikings by Robert Ferguson

I recently put a specialist academic textbook about the conversion of Scandinavia on my wish list, and someone bought it for me. At that point I realised I've probably forgotten most of what I knew about the basics, so I grabbed this from the library.

It's a pretty good general history, though it concentrated more on the Scandinavian contact with the outside world, where what I want to know is what was actually going on in the Nordic countries.

It answered some questions, though. Even at the level I was studying history, back in the early 90s, the reasons for the ferocity with which the Viking raiders treated the monastic communities of Europe were presented as unknown (aside from having figured out that that's where the Christians kept the good stuff), down to innate brutality. Ferguson posits that it was because Charlemagne and his successors had converted the Saxons and other German tribes with extreme prejudice and bloodshed. The refugees from these forced conversions made their way north. Thus the Viking raiders knew that their way of life was under threat from the church.

It also confirmed that one of the things I picked up as almost certainly wrong in Jared Diamond's Collapse is indeed wrong. Diamond proposes that one of the reasons for the failure of the Greenland colony (as if Black Death in Europe + Little Ice Age aren't enough) is that there is evidence they had a taboo against eating fish. Which makes NO SENSE whatsoever. According to Ferguson, evidence for consumption of fish has been found at archaeological investigations of the Greenland colony.

Date: 2012-10-06 08:51 am (UTC)
kest: (kest)
From: [personal profile] kest
I keep hearing about more things that Diamond had wrong, which is very educational on one hand, but I think I no longer trust a single word he says.

Date: 2012-10-06 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inulro.livejournal.com
Having a MA in medieval history focussing on the Vikings in the Celtic world, his claim about Greenlanders having a taboo about eating fish rang a lot of NOT RIGHT bells. But I was a bundle of fibro brain fog at the time and completely unable to do even the basic research that would have verified my feelings.

Date: 2012-10-06 12:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inulro.livejournal.com
And speaking of which, there's a new book out that claims that he (and everyone else) was completely wrong about Easter Island being completely degraded in the pursuit of bigger and better giant stone heads. I haven't read it yet - I was waiting for the paperback, which might be out now.

Date: 2012-10-06 04:39 pm (UTC)
kest: (kest)
From: [personal profile] kest
Yeah, that's one of the things I was thinking of. Apparently his timeline is slightly off, and it is more likely that the deforestation of the island happened due to the arrival of explorers and the non-native rats in their ships, which then ate the seeds of the trees. Or something like that.

Also, I read a fascinating (due to subject matter - it was pretty dry and academic) article that argued that what he (in Guns, Germs, and Steel) and all my elementary school teachers said about the native americans lacking natural immunities is probably wrong. That there may have been some lack of natural antibodies that contributed to the devastating impact of smallpox, etc. but there were also a lot of other factors, including droughts (leading to starvation), wars and violence (both between tribes and from the europeans), and stress from the above factors that led to lowered immune systems. And of course the fact that they were being deliberately infected. (Happy Columbus Day! :/ )
Edited Date: 2012-10-06 04:41 pm (UTC)

Profile

inulro: (Default)
inulro

May 2022

S M T W T F S
1234567
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 8th, 2026 02:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios