The DaVinci Code
Jan. 29th, 2005 12:14 amSeeing as I'm still awake:
I finally started to read it this week. It's bad - the prose is awful & very amateurish (except I know lots of amateurs who can structure much nicer sentences). I could write a book on the factual inaccuracies[1]. It is almost funny, but not quite. It is definitely the version for people who couldn't get through either Foucault's Pendulum (which actually *is* funny, and is making fun of people who believe this stuff) or Holy Blood & the Holy Grail (which is tosh, but has the advantage of being very well written tosh).
Yet I can't stop reading it. It's very compelling crap.
[1] The truly offensive one is the "Fact" about the Priory of Sion in the introduction. The document is indeed in the Bibliotheque Nationale, but scholars agree it's a hoax.
I finally started to read it this week. It's bad - the prose is awful & very amateurish (except I know lots of amateurs who can structure much nicer sentences). I could write a book on the factual inaccuracies[1]. It is almost funny, but not quite. It is definitely the version for people who couldn't get through either Foucault's Pendulum (which actually *is* funny, and is making fun of people who believe this stuff) or Holy Blood & the Holy Grail (which is tosh, but has the advantage of being very well written tosh).
Yet I can't stop reading it. It's very compelling crap.
[1] The truly offensive one is the "Fact" about the Priory of Sion in the introduction. The document is indeed in the Bibliotheque Nationale, but scholars agree it's a hoax.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-29 12:23 am (UTC)Not that I've ever watched a train crash, mind, but you get the idea...
no subject
Date: 2005-01-29 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-29 10:25 am (UTC)Did you get my email btw?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-29 10:58 am (UTC)I'm just finishing Digital Fortress at the moment and that is very silly and a lot of the computer stuff is not accurate but its still compelling.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-29 11:15 am (UTC)Isn't this the nature of most bestsellers though? They're best selling not because they're any good, in the sense you mean, but because they're addictive... :)
(Got your video btw, can't remember if I emailed to say or not, been mostly PC-less the last week or so... thank you very much! Haven't watched it yet though!)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-29 12:17 pm (UTC)It is definitely the version for people who couldn't get through either Foucault's Pendulum
*chortle* Ah, thankyou so much for saying that. :) Being the huge fan of F.P. that I am, I've leant it to many people over the years. I'm never offended if they give up on it and say they couldn't get into it. It's not the easiest novel ever written, for sure. But it does amuse me how a few of those same people have recently raced through DaVinci Code... :D
no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-29 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 01:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 01:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-30 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-31 09:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-31 08:04 pm (UTC)